GradeGen

Fair treatment, including holding people accountable for wrongdoing and protecting people's rights.

Treating people fairly, respecting their rights and challenging conditions that deny them dignity.

This also connects charity with justice. Giving food can meet an immediate need; working to change conditions that keep people hungry addresses the underlying problem. Catholic social teaching encourages both responses.

Treating people fairly and addressing unfair conditions that prevent them from meeting their needs.

Treating people fairly, doing what is right and putting right wrongdoing; in Judaism, this includes protecting people's dignity and helping those in need.

Fair treatment of people, including defending their rights and challenging oppression.

Fair treatment of people, protecting their rights and responding fairly to wrongdoing.

Fair treatment, including protecting people's rights and addressing injustice.

Fairness, including a fair trial and a punishment appropriate to the offence.

Four important aims are justice, retribution, deterrence and reformation. One sentence can serve several aims.

Fair treatment, including holding offenders accountable, recognising victims’ rights and imposing appropriate punishments.

Fair treatment that responds appropriately to wrongdoing and protects people’s rights.

Fairness, including fair treatment under the law and a punishment appropriate to the offence.

Fairness in how people are treated, including holding people accountable and giving an appropriate response to wrongdoing.

Fair treatment of people, including protecting their rights and challenging injustice.

Judging rightly and giving people what is due to them, without error or unfairness.

Explain the connection between a belief and an action: for example, tzedakah is a duty of justice, so giving to people in need is not simply an optional favour.

Do not assume that forgiveness removes the need for justice or that all believers agree about how peace should be achieved.

In evaluation, weigh the arguments rather than just listing them. Consider whether imprisonment could achieve protection and justice without execution.