The Experience of War

Women's Recruitment and Military Integration

For centuries, women were largely unofficial camp followers, but the demands of 20th-century warfare transformed them into essential military personnel. During the First World War, over 100,000 women served voluntarily in Auxiliary roles, training at major hubs like Tidworth on Salisbury Plain.

The Second World War marked a radical structural change. From December 1941, unmarried women aged 20 to 30 were officially conscripted into the military or vital industry. Their roles expanded beyond cooking and transport into highly technical fields, such as radar operation and mechanics, with extensive training at camps like Cowdray Park.

When male National Service ended in 1960, the military faced a severe Manpower Gap. To solve this, the permanent WRAC (Women's Royal Army Corps) was expanded. Women trained at Queen Elizabeth Park in Guildford and served in over 40 specialized trades, freeing up men for frontline duties. By 2018, all close combat and infantry roles were finally opened to women, completing their full integration into the armed forces.

The Impact of War on Civilians and Conscientious Objectors

Modern warfare does not just happen on distant battlefields; it transforms the daily lives of the people left behind. The 20th century saw the rise of Total War, where the entire civilian population and economy were mobilised to support the war effort. During WWII, the Home Front became a target; the Blitz (1940–41) killed over 40,000 civilians, while many people were displaced through Evacuation. Daily life was transformed by Rationing, which ensured the fair distribution of food during naval blockades.

This total mobilisation heavily impacted the treatment of the Conscientious Objector (CO). During WWI, COs faced harsh, punitive treatment. Absolutists, who refused any war-related work, were subjected to solitary confinement and hard labour. This brutality was designed to deter others and maintain public support for the war.

By WWII, the government adopted a more lenient, pragmatic approach. Special tribunals still judged the sincerity of COs, but the majority were Alternativists who were assigned vital civilian work, such as forestry and farming. This softer approach was actively used to contrast British democratic freedoms with the tyranny of Nazi Germany.

The Fear of Nuclear War

During the Cold War, the development of atomic weapons shifted civilian anxieties away from conventional bombing campaigns to the existential dread of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). The famous 4-Minute Warning before a missile impact left the public feeling like permanent, helpless targets. Unlike WWII, where the RAF could defend the skies, there was no effective defense against nuclear annihilation.

The government attempted to manage this fear with "Protect and Survive" propaganda booklets (1980), instructing civilians on how to build makeshift fallout rooms. However, many citizens rejected these measures and protested instead. The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), formed in 1957, demanded Unilateral Disarmament, organising massive demonstrations like the Aldermaston Marches to protest Britain being used as a front-line nuclear base.

Evaluation: Comparing Total War and the Nuclear Threat

To Evaluate the transformative nature of war, we must weigh the physical reality of Total War against the psychological threat of the Cold War.

• Arguments for Total War being more transformative: WWI and WWII physically restructured society. Civilians were active participants—as factory workers, wardens, or victims of the Blitz. The economic impact was absolute, with Rationing and female conscription changing the nation's social fabric for decades.
• Arguments for the Nuclear Threat being more transformative: The Cold War created a unique psychological "culture of fear." For the first time, death could be instant and total, with no possible defense. While Total War ended, the nuclear threat was continuous, turning every home into a potential front line for decades.
• Balanced Judgement: Total War was more physically transformative, requiring radical changes to the daily lived experience and survival of the population. However, the Nuclear Threat was more psychologically transformative; while its physical destruction remained unrealised, it fundamentally ended the idea of civilian "safety" and created a permanent state of existential anxiety.

War Reporting, Propaganda, and Censorship

Governments have historically relied on Propaganda to boost public morale and encourage recruitment, while simultaneously using Censorship to restrict information that might cause panic.

During WWI, the government used the Defence of the Realm Act (DORA) to legally censor letters from the trenches. Meanwhile, propaganda films like The Battle of the Somme (1916) were released to millions to justify high casualty rates. In WWII, the Ministry of Information tightly controlled the narrative with campaigns like "Dig for Victory," whilst newspaper editors practiced self-censorship.

Conversely, independent war reporting has frequently shifted public attitudes. During the Crimean War, William Howard Russell's reports in The Times exposed leadership failures, directly leading to the collapse of the government. In the 21st century, the 2003 Iraq War saw 24-hour news cycles and embedded journalists broadcast the chaotic reality of insurgency, rapidly eroding public support for the initial "Mission Accomplished" narrative.