Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Edexcel GCSE History · 1HI0
Edexcel 1HI0 · Nature of Law Enforcement and Punishment Check the specification (PDF) (opens in a new tab)
By 1900, Britain already had professional police forces. Officers patrolled streets, investigated crimes and arrested suspects. These responsibilities continued throughout the twentieth century, but the methods available to the police changed greatly. Faster transport and communication improved their response to incidents, scientific evidence helped identify suspects, and specialist training prepared officers for more complex tasks.
Law enforcement also continued to depend on the public. Police needed people to report offences and provide information. In modern Britain, organised schemes such as Neighbourhood Watch developed this cooperation, with an emphasis on preventing crime before it happened.
In 1900, an officer usually walked a beat: a regular patrol route through an area. A whistle could attract attention or summon nearby help, but an officer's ability to respond was limited by distance and walking speed.
Police bicycles, introduced in 1909, allowed officers to travel and pursue suspects more quickly. During the 1930s, police cars and two-way radios further changed police work. Cars increased the distance officers could cover, while radios allowed officers to exchange information without returning to a station. A description of a suspect could therefore be passed to other officers while an incident was still unfolding.
The introduction of the 999 emergency telephone number in the 1930s also made it easier for the public to request urgent help. These developments connected members of the public, police stations and officers on patrol more effectively. They changed how police responded to crime, rather than merely making an individual officer move faster.
Forensic science gave investigators evidence beyond witness accounts, interviews and information supplied by the public. In 1901, a fingerprint branch was established at New Scotland Yard, the Metropolitan Police headquarters. Fingerprints left at a crime scene could be compared with those of a suspect, helping connect a person with a place or object.
Scientific understanding of blood also developed. The discovery of different blood groups in 1901 helped investigators compare blood evidence, while improved microscopes made smaller traces easier to examine. Blood-group evidence could narrow the investigation, but it was less individualising than later DNA profiling because many people share a blood group.
DNA analysis was a major further development. Investigators could compare a DNA profile from biological material at a crime scene with a person's profile. The first murder conviction using DNA evidence occurred in 1988. The National DNA Database, established in 1995, then made stored profiles available for comparison in investigations.
This changed the basis on which police could identify or eliminate suspects. Rather than relying only on what somebody remembered seeing, investigators could also examine physical traces. However, a match still had to be interpreted: evidence linking someone to a scene did not, by itself, explain everything that had happened there.
Computerised records made information easier to store, search and share. This mattered because an investigation might require officers to connect information collected at different times or in different places. Fingerprint and DNA databases supported comparisons that would have been much more difficult using only paper records.
CCTV—closed-circuit television—provided another form of evidence. Recordings could help police identify suspects and reconstruct events. Automatic number plate recognition allowed vehicle number plates to be read and checked electronically, assisting the detection of driving offences. Tablets and smartphones also enabled officers to record and share information directly from crime scenes.
These tools did not remove the need for investigation. They increased the evidence available and helped police find connections within it.
As police work became more varied and technically demanding, officers increasingly needed particular expertise. Specialisation meant that not every officer performed every task in the same way.
Officers dealing with national security and terrorism required specialist training and knowledge. Other demanding duties included using firearms or tasers, riding police horses and operating police motorbikes. These required skills beyond ordinary foot patrol work.
Scientific and technological developments also reinforced the importance of expertise. Collecting and interpreting forensic evidence or using complex information systems required training. Specialisation therefore allowed the police to tackle particular problems more effectively, while general patrol and investigative responsibilities continued.
Neighbourhood Watch developed from an American model at a time of concern about rising crime. The first UK scheme began in 1982 at Mollington in Cheshire, where it was called Home Watch. Local residents worked together and liaised with the police, initially focusing particularly on burglary and other crimes affecting homes and individuals.
The principle was cooperation: residents could notice suspicious activity, report concerns and share crime-prevention information. Their knowledge of the neighbourhood could complement police work. This was voluntary participation, unlike the compulsory community responsibilities of Anglo-Saxon law enforcement.
The movement grew through local, county and regional groups. In 2007, support from the police and the Home Office, the government department responsible for policing, helped establish a national umbrella organisation. In 2017, the present Neighbourhood Watch Network was established as a charitable organisation to replace the earlier network.
Its aims broadened as crime changed. Alongside protecting homes, the movement increasingly addressed community safety and online crime. This shows both continuity and change: local people still helped maintain order, but now through a voluntary partnership with professional police and a wider national organisation.
Prevention means reducing the likelihood of crime occurring. It was not a completely new police aim: earlier street patrols already sought to deter offenders. Modern policing expanded the means of prevention through technology and cooperation with communities.
Breathalysers, introduced in 1967, enabled roadside testing of drivers' alcohol levels. They helped detect drink-driving, while the increased chance of being caught could discourage others from doing it. Speed cameras similarly combined detection with deterrence. CCTV could both supply evidence after an offence and discourage offending where people knew they were being filmed.
Neighbourhood Watch represented another preventive approach. Police and residents could share information and address risks before an offence occurred, rather than only responding afterwards.
The overall change was therefore not a simple switch from catching criminals to preventing crime. Modern law enforcement combined continuing investigation and arrest with faster responses, more specialised expertise, scientific evidence and a broader range of preventive methods.
Explain how a development changed police work: DNA provided a new way to link suspects to crime-scene evidence, not simply a faster investigation.
For a comparison, give a specific feature of both periods. Contrast early twentieth-century foot patrols and whistles with later cars and two-way radios.
Do not describe prevention as completely new: nineteenth-century patrols already aimed to deter crime. Modern policing expanded the methods available.
Distinguish voluntary community support from professional policing: Neighbourhood Watch works with the police rather than replacing them.
It can see this note and what your specification asks for.
Answers are free with an account.
1 free note left this week
Get more free notesYour answer sets when this note comes back for review, or marks it complete.
Was this note helpful?
Log in to tell us whether it helped, or to report a problem.
Last updated
Law enforcement
The work of preventing crime, investigating offences and taking action against suspected offenders.
Specialisation
The development of officers or units with training and expertise for particular kinds of police work.
Forensic science
The use of scientific methods to examine evidence connected with a crime, such as fingerprints, blood or DNA.
DNA profile
A pattern produced by analysing selected parts of a person's DNA, which can be compared with DNA recovered from a crime scene.
Deterrence
Discouraging people from committing offences by increasing their fear of being detected or facing consequences.
Neighbourhood Watch
A voluntary movement in which local people work together and with the police to prevent crime and improve community safety.
Put your knowledge into practice — try past paper questions for History
Law enforcement
The work of preventing crime, investigating offences and taking action against suspected offenders.
Specialisation
The development of officers or units with training and expertise for particular kinds of police work.
Forensic science
The use of scientific methods to examine evidence connected with a crime, such as fingerprints, blood or DNA.
DNA profile
A pattern produced by analysing selected parts of a person's DNA, which can be compared with DNA recovered from a crime scene.
Deterrence
Discouraging people from committing offences by increasing their fear of being detected or facing consequences.
Neighbourhood Watch
A voluntary movement in which local people work together and with the police to prevent crime and improve community safety.