Why do we punish criminals? In the 18th and 19th centuries, the answer to this question underwent a massive shift, fundamentally changing the British justice system.
Historically, justice was built on retribution (an "eye for an eye") and deterrence (frightening the public into obeying the law). Authorities believed that harsh, terrifying punishments were the only way to maintain order without a police force.
However, during the 19th century, the focus shifted towards rehabilitation and reform. This was the belief that a criminal's character could be changed through education, hard work, and religious instruction. This shift was largely driven by humanitarianism, a growing movement that argued for human dignity and campaigned against punishments they viewed as barbaric.
In the early 1800s, you could be hanged simply for stealing a loaf of bread or cutting down a tree. This extreme legal system is known as the Bloody Code.
The Bloody Code (1688–1815) saw the number of crimes punishable by capital punishment rise from 50 in 1688 to a peak of 222 by 1810. The 1723 Waltham Black Act alone made over 50 offences capital, including poaching deer with a disguised face. The primary purpose was social control; wealthy landowners used the threat of death to protect their property from the growing urban poor during the Industrial Revolution.
Ultimately, the Bloody Code failed and was abolished for several reasons:
Today, relocating to Australia is a dream for many, but in the late 18th century, it was designed as a dreaded punishment. Transportation to Australia began in 1787 and ended in 1868.
During this period, approximately 160,000 convicts were transported. The majority (80%) were petty thieves, and about 15-20% were women. It was initially implemented because British prisons and floating Hulks were dangerously overcrowded. It also acted as a severe alternative to the Bloody Code, providing a punishment that juries were actually willing to convict criminals for, while simultaneously providing free labour to build the new colony.
Transportation was eventually abolished due to several key factors:
Going to a hanging used to be treated as a popular family day out. Authorities originally held executions in public to act as the ultimate physical deterrent.
However, the Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868 officially moved all executions behind prison walls. The final public execution was of Michael Barrett in May 1868.
Public executions were ended because they completely failed as a deterrent. Executions developed a "carnival atmosphere" where crowds became drunk and treated the event as cheap entertainment. Furthermore, they caused public disorder; crowds often treated the condemned criminals as heroes, and the massive gatherings provided perfect opportunities for further crime, especially pickpocketing. Reformers like Charles Dickens also campaigned against them on humanitarian grounds, arguing the spectacle was dehumanizing.
Understanding modern policing and the shift toward prison reform requires looking at one key individual: Robert Peel. As Home Secretary, Peel was crucial in dismantling the Bloody Code and modernising the justice system.
Peel pushed for proportionate punishment, removing the death penalty for over 100 offences to ensure the punishment fit the crime. Influenced by humanitarian reformers like Elizabeth Fry, Peel introduced the 1823 Gaols Act. This act mandated the separation of prisoners by gender and crime type, banned the routine use of chains, and introduced paid gaolers and chaplains to encourage reform.
However, the 1823 Gaols Act only applied to the 130 largest prisons and was frequently ignored. To solve this, the 1835 Prisons Act introduced national prison inspectors to enforce the changes. Peel also established the first professional police force via the 1829 Metropolitan Police Act, shifting the philosophy of justice from "deterrence through severity" to "deterrence through detection".
Students often claim the death penalty was abolished in 1868; in reality, only PUBLIC executions ended, while the death penalty itself remained for murder until 1965.
In 12- and 16-mark 'Explain' questions, use the SPEND acronym (Statistics, Places, Events, Names, Dates) to secure Level 4 marks—for example, citing that the Bloody Code peaked at 222 capital crimes.
When explaining the end of the Bloody Code, examiners explicitly look for the term 'proportionate punishment' to explain why juries committed pious perjury.
Always link individual reformers (like Elizabeth Fry) to legislative change (like Peel's 1823 Gaols Act) to demonstrate how humanitarian ideas caused practical shifts in punishment.
Retribution
A philosophy of punishment based on criminals paying for their crime through equal suffering, often described as 'an eye for an eye'.
Deterrence
A punishment designed to frighten the individual or the wider public into obeying the law.
Rehabilitation
The process of changing a criminal's character through education, work, or religious instruction so they can reintegrate into society.
Reform
The belief or process of changing a criminal's character and behaviour so they can become a law-abiding member of society.
Humanitarianism
A 19th-century movement that argued for human dignity and campaigned against brutal or barbaric punishments.
Bloody Code
The name given to the English legal system between 1688 and 1815 when the number of capital crimes rose to over 200.
Capital punishment
The legally authorised killing of someone as punishment for a crime (the death penalty).
Pious perjury
When a jury deliberately finds a defendant not guilty or lies about the value of stolen goods to save them from the death penalty.
Transportation
A punishment where criminals were exiled to a penal colony, such as Australia, to serve their sentence.
Hulks
Disused warships used as temporary, heavily overcrowded floating prisons.
Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868
The law that officially ended public hangings, moving all executions behind closed prison walls.
Proportionate punishment
The legal principle that the severity of the punishment should closely match the severity of the crime committed.
Put your knowledge into practice — try past paper questions for History
Retribution
A philosophy of punishment based on criminals paying for their crime through equal suffering, often described as 'an eye for an eye'.
Deterrence
A punishment designed to frighten the individual or the wider public into obeying the law.
Rehabilitation
The process of changing a criminal's character through education, work, or religious instruction so they can reintegrate into society.
Reform
The belief or process of changing a criminal's character and behaviour so they can become a law-abiding member of society.
Humanitarianism
A 19th-century movement that argued for human dignity and campaigned against brutal or barbaric punishments.
Bloody Code
The name given to the English legal system between 1688 and 1815 when the number of capital crimes rose to over 200.
Capital punishment
The legally authorised killing of someone as punishment for a crime (the death penalty).
Pious perjury
When a jury deliberately finds a defendant not guilty or lies about the value of stolen goods to save them from the death penalty.
Transportation
A punishment where criminals were exiled to a penal colony, such as Australia, to serve their sentence.
Hulks
Disused warships used as temporary, heavily overcrowded floating prisons.
Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868
The law that officially ended public hangings, moving all executions behind closed prison walls.
Proportionate punishment
The legal principle that the severity of the punishment should closely match the severity of the crime committed.